Ad x Organic Booking Correlation Analysis

TOMOGO! | Data: 2025-01-01 ~ 2026-04-19 (474 days) | Generated: 2026-04-20 (Final)

Conclusion: No correlation exists between ad-driven and organic bookings

Using Facebook Ads purchase events (MobileAppPurchases + WebsitePurchases) from AD_RAW, we found no correlation between days with ad-attributed bookings and organic booking volume. The previous "no correlation" conclusion remains unchanged.

The apparent co-occurrence observed on 4/16-17 was caused by a single user making multiple bookings, inflating the organic count. This is noise, not a structural pattern.

1. Analysis Premise

Hypothesis

Previously, the team concluded there was no correlation between ad-driven bookings and organic bookings. Recent weekend observations suggested ad bookings and organic bookings might be co-occurring. This analysis re-examines whether that conclusion has changed.

Data Sources

DataSourcePurpose
Ad bookingsAD_RAW.xlsx > Facebook Ads > MobileAppPurchases (col N) + WebsitePurchases (col P)Actual FB ad-attributed bookings
Total bookings_daily_data.xlsx > Bookings(Total)All-channel bookings
Organic bookingsTotal bookings - FB ad bookings (approximation)Non-ad bookings
FB ad spendAD_RAW.xlsx > Facebook Ads > Cost (col L)Proxy for ad activity level
Methodology improvement: The previous version used Conversions(Ad) from _daily_data, which mixed install campaign CVs and Instagram profile visit CVs. This version isolates Facebook Ads Purchase events only from AD_RAW for accurate analysis.

2. Scale: FB Ad Booking Contribution

747
Total Bookings (474 days)
51 (6.8%)
FB Ad-Attributed Bookings
696 (93.2%)
Organic Bookings
FB ads directly generated only 6.8% of all bookings. 93% of bookings come from organic sources (direct, search, SNS, etc.). Current ads primarily drive awareness and installs, not bookings.

3. Core Analysis: FB Ad Bookings x Organic Bookings

Periodr (Pearson)nFB BookingsOrganicInterpretation
2025 Q1 (Jan-Mar)0.0090051No FB bookings
2025 Q2 (Apr-Jun)0.0091071No FB bookings
2025 Q3 (Jul-Sep)0.0092072No FB bookings
2025 Q4 (Oct-Dec)+0.229214234Weak positive
2026 Q1 (Jan-Mar)+0.029031237No correlation
2026 Apr (1-19)+0.1619631No correlation
Past 30 days-0.02311560No correlation
Past 14 days+0.1415528No correlation
Across all periods, there is no significant correlation between FB ad bookings and organic bookings.

4. FB Ad Spend x Total Bookings: Period Comparison

PeriodrnAvg FB Spend/dayAvg BK/dayInterpretation
2025 Q1 (Jan-Mar)-0.409060,5450.6Inverse
2025 Q2 (Apr-Jun)-0.149174,5540.8No correlation
2025 Q3 (Jul-Sep)-0.039259,3260.8No correlation
2025 Q4 (Oct-Dec)+0.439292,3412.7Moderate positive (peak season)
2026 Q1 (Jan-Mar)+0.1390101,1383.0No correlation
2026 Apr (1-19)-0.271990,3311.9Weak inverse
Only Q4 2025 (peak season) showed a positive correlation (r=+0.43), likely driven by seasonal booking increases coinciding with higher ad spend. All other periods show no correlation or inverse correlation.

Weekly: FB Ad Spend x Bookings

PeriodFB Cost vs Total BK (r)FB Cost vs Organic (r)Interpretation
All time+0.43+0.39Seasonal bias
Last 16w+0.21+0.08No correlation
Last 12w-0.03-0.18No correlation
Last 8w-0.56-0.60Strong inverse
In the last 8 weeks, FB ad spend and organic bookings show r=-0.60 inverse correlation. Weeks with higher spend had fewer organic bookings.

5. Lag Analysis: Delayed Effects

FB Ad Bookings(t) → Organic Bookings(t+lag)

"Does an ad booking on day t predict organic bookings N days later?"

LagPast 90d (r)Past 30d (r)Interpretation
Same day+0.03-0.02No correlation
+1 day+0.03+0.27Weak signal
+2 days+0.05+0.14No correlation
+3 days+0.20+0.37Weak signal
+5 days+0.03+0.18No correlation
+7 days-0.21-0.11No correlation
The Lag+3 signal (r=+0.37) in the past 30 days is noise.
The 6 organic bookings on 4/17 were from a single user making multiple reservations. On a unique-user basis, this is effectively 1 booking. This single user's bulk purchase inflated the lag correlation and does not represent a structural pattern.

FB Ad Spend(t) → Organic Bookings(t+lag)

LagPast 90d (r)Past 30d (r)Interpretation
Same day-0.08-0.17No correlation
+1 day-0.03-0.13No correlation
+2 days-0.05-0.31Inverse
+3 days+0.03-0.21Weak inverse
+5 days-0.04-0.30Inverse
+7 days-0.12-0.49Moderate inverse (30d)
All lags show negative correlation for ad spend. At Lag+7 days in the past 30 days, r=-0.49. This is the opposite of the SNS lag pattern (r=+0.6 at 7 days), suggesting ad spend and SNS have fundamentally different booking conversion dynamics.

6. Impact of Install Campaign Scale-Down

Install-Heavy
(W04-W08, 5w)
Install-Light
(W09-W15, 7w)
Change
Avg FB Installs/week71042-94%
Avg FB Ad Spend/week948,992832,497-12%
Avg Bookings/week23.819.7-17%
Installs dropped 94% but bookings only dropped 17%. Install campaigns have very low booking conversion efficiency. Note: seasonality (Jan-Feb vs Mar-Apr) may also contribute.

7. April Daily Breakdown

DateFB BKOrganicTotalFB SpendInstalls
4/1011127,9663
4/2112124,5852
4/3000112,6874
4/4011121,7073
4/5000136,5641
4/6101147,9289
4/7011124,8286
4/801177,7984
4/903346,3414
4/1003346,9674
4/1102248,6812
4/1200063,1574
4/1303364,5390
4/1400054,8513
4/1502247,4132
4/1632581,5676
4/1716*786,5203
4/1802296,7013
4/19033105,4844

*4/17 organic count of 6 includes multiple bookings from a single user. Unique user increase was minimal.

4/9-11: Lowest FB spend days (46K-49K) had the most organic bookings (8 total).
4/3-6: Highest FB spend days (113K-148K) produced only 1 booking.
Ad spend level does not determine booking occurrence.

8. Weekly Trend (Last 16 Weeks)

WeekFB SpendFB BKOrganicTotalInstalls
W00 (late Dec)319,14211314497
W01415,4861891,006
W02551,238012121,332
W03851,479310131,352
W041,013,274102737936
W05874,38911516805
W06935,92111516596
W07841,28212223591
W08597,81802727433
W09478,8221313293
W10538,7671192029
W11677,2048152347
W12743,5612171935
W13887,512291130
W14555,7001101133
W15537,0754182221
W04 (FB spend over 1M) had 37 bookings total, but only 10 from FB ads — 27 were organic. W09 (FB spend 479K) had 32 bookings with organic at its peak of 31. Doubling ad spend does not proportionally increase bookings.

9. Final Conclusion

Previous "no correlation" conclusion remains unchanged
TestResult
FB ad bookings x organic bookings (daily)r = -0.02 (past 30d). No correlation.
FB ad spend x organic bookings (weekly, last 8w)r = -0.60. Inverse correlation.
Lag effect (FB bookings → organic increase N days later)Lag+3 r=+0.37 signal was noise from 1 user's multiple bookings.
Install scale-down impactInstalls -94% but bookings only -17%. Low install-to-booking efficiency.
FB ad direct booking contribution51 of 747 total bookings (6.8%). 93% are organic.

10. Next Actions

PriorityActionRationale
1Focus on LP / Web CVR improvementIncreasing ad spend does not increase bookings. Fixing the landing experience (Web CVR 0.1%) is the priority
2Fix UTM tracking (broken since 1/16)Without proper attribution, accurate ad effectiveness measurement is impossible
3Redefine ad role: awareness/install, not booking acquisitionAds contribute only 6.8% of bookings. Evaluate as awareness investment with adjusted KPIs
4Compare with SNS lag correlationAd lag is negative; SNS lag is positive (r=+0.6 at 7 days). SNS may be more effective for booking conversion
5Introduce unique-user based booking analysisMulti-booking by single users distorts data. UU-based metrics needed for accurate decision-making

Assumptions: Ad data filtered to Facebook Ads only (ServiceName = "Facebook Ads") from AD_RAW. Booking events: MobileAppPurchases (col N) + WebsitePurchases (col P). Organic bookings = Total - FB bookings (approximation; other platform bookings included but Google/TikTok had 0 CV in April). Correlation coefficients for small-sample periods should be treated as indicative.